4.7 Article

Luminescence switching of CdTe quantum dots in presence of p-sulfonatocalix[4]arene to detect pesticides in aqueous solution

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 78, Issue 4-5, Pages 1359-1363

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.02.013

Keywords

Quantum dots; Calixarene; Pesticides; Fenamithion; Acetamiprid

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20602015, 20772038]
  2. Program for Distinguish Young Scientist of Hubei Province [2007ABB017]
  3. Program for Chenguang Young Scientist for Wuhan [200750731283]
  4. Hubei Key Laboratory of Catalysis and Materials Science [CHCL0805]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple, rapid, and sensitive identification method of fenamithion and acetamiprid is developed using supramolecular nano-sensitizers combining of CdTe quantum dots (QDs) and p-sulfonatocalix[4]arene as additive by fluorescent spectroscopic technique in water. Depending on p-sulfonatocalix[4]arene, the selectivity of CdTe QDs is tuned between fenamithion and acetamiprid. The luminescence of free CdTe QDs is quenched selectively to fenamithion. While in the presence of p-sulfonatocalix[4]arene, it shows that the fluorescence intensity of QDs is enhanced selectively to acetamiprid due to the cooperation of QDs and p-sulfonatocalix[4]arene. Based on the response characteristics of the QDs. a fluorescent method is performed for tuning selective determination of the pesticides. Under optimum conditions described, it is found that the pesticides effect on the luminescence of the CdTe QDs in concentrations dependence are described by a Stern-Volmer-type equation or a Langmuir binding isotherm equation in the range of 0-10(-4) M (fenamithion) and 0-10(-3) M (acetamiprid), with the corresponding detection limits (17) of 1.2 x 10(-8) M (fenamithion) and 3.4 x 10(-8) M (acetamiprid), respectively. The possible mechanism is discussed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available