4.7 Article

A critical evaluation of digestion procedures for coffee samples using diluted nitric acid in closed vessels for inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 78, Issue 4-5, Pages 1378-1382

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.02.030

Keywords

Microwave-assisted heating; Conductive heating; Closed vessel; Acid decomposition; Diluted nitric acid; Liquid phase oxidizing process; Gas phase conversion

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desen-volvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq),
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. NQA (PRONEX, FAPESB-CNPq)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficiency of diluted nitric acid solutions for digesting regular coffee samples was evaluated employing two closed vessel procedures: one was based on microwave-assisted heating and the other was based on conductive heating using pressurized Parr bomb. The efficiency of digestion was evaluated by determining residual carbon content (RCC) and residual acidity. The digestion was effective using both procedures, i.e. there were no solid residues after the decomposition reactions when using up to 3.5 mol L-1 nitric acid solutions. It was demonstrated that the digestion procedures are critically dependent on reactions Occurring in liquid and gas phase and that the formation of NO and its conversion to NO2 by O-2 exerts a major effect in the oxidation of organic matter. These processes are more effective in closed vessels heated by microwave radiation due to the greater volume of these flasks and the temperature gradient that exists during the first step of the digestion process. The proposed model for the digestion processes in diluted nitric acid solution is corroborated by data about consumption of acid during the digestion and by measuring the pressure during the whole process. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available