4.7 Article

Determination of 7-aminoflunitrazepam in urine by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages 618-622

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.12.021

Keywords

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; 7-Aminoflunitrazepam; Liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry; Urine sample

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction(DLLME) and liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ES-MS/MS) procedure was presented for the extraction and determination of 7-aminoflunitrazepam (7-aminoFM2), a biomarker of the hypnotic flunitrazepam (FM2) in urine sample. The method was based on the formation of tiny droplets of an organic extractant in the sample solution using water-immiscible organic solvent [dichloromethane (DCM), an extractant] dissolved in water-miscible organic dispersive solvent [isopropyl alcohol (IPA)]. First, 7-aminoFM2 from basified urine sample was extracted into the dispersed DCM droplets. The extracting organic phase was separated by centrifuging and the sedimented phase was transferred into a 300 mu l vial insert and evaporated to dryness. The residue was reconstituted in 30 mu l mobile phase (20:80, acetonitrile:water). An aliquot of 20 mu l as injected into LC-ES-MS/MS. Various parameters affecting the extraction efficiency (type and volume of extraction and dispersive solvent, effect of alkali and salt) were evaluated. Under optimum conditions, precision. linearity (correlation coefficient, r(2) = 0.988 over the concentration range of 0.05-2.5 ng/ml), detection limit (0.025 ng/ml) and enrichment factor (20) had been obtained. To our knowledge, DLLME was applied to urine sample for the first time. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available