4.7 Article

Affinity-based elimination of aromatic VOCs by highly crystalline multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages 1265-1270

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.08.041

Keywords

highly crystalline multi-walled carbon nanotubes (HC-MWCNTs); volatile organic compounds (VOCs); affinity-based adsorption; LUMO-HOMO interaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are capable of adsorbing pollutant chemicals. Their adsorptive capacities and adsorbing mechanisms, however, are not fully understood. As-grown CNTs often contain both crystalline and amorphous carbon, and the ratio of carbon types can affect adsorption. In this study, highly crystalline multi-walled carbon nanotubes (HC-MWCNTs) were used as the adsorbent for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in contaminated air samples. Air containing 23 added VOCs (1,1-dichloroethylene, dichloromethane, trans-1,2-dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-dichloroethylene, chloroform, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, 1,2-dichloroethane, benzene, trichloroethylene, 1,2-dichloropropane, bromodichloromethane, cis-1,3-dichloropropene, toluene, trans-1,3-dichloropropene, 1, 1,2-trichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene, dibromochloromethane, m-xylene, p-xylene, o-xylene, bromoform, and p-dichlorobenzene) was used for model samples. Adsorptive experiments were carried out by passing the air samples through a cartridge packed with HC-MWCNTs. Initial results showing high selectivity and high affinity for adsorbing aromatic VOCs (benzene, toluene, m-xylene, p-xylene, o-xylene, and p-dichlorobenzene) have provided new insight into the adsorption mechanisms. Data suggest that the HC-MWCNTs, unlike conventional carbon materials, adsorb aromatic compounds according to Fukui's frontier theory, which is based on the interactions between the HOMO and LUMO of the aromatic VOCs and those of the HC-MWCNTs. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available