4.2 Article

Co-variation of lichens, bryophytes, saproxylic beetles and dead wood in Swedish boreal forests

Journal

SYSTEMATICS AND BIODIVERSITY
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 247-256

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14772001003786022

Keywords

beta-diversity; bryophytes; dead wood; lichens; red-listed species; reserve selection; saproxylic beetles; species richness; surrogate capacity

Funding

  1. FORMAS
  2. Skogforsk
  3. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to effectively identify and protect the most valuable forest areas for conservation, it is essential to understand species diversity patterns and the co-variation of different taxonomic groups. In this study we analysed the extent to which lichens, bryophytes and saproxylic beetles co-vary, their ability to represent each other in a reserve network (surrogate capacity), and their patterns of beta-diversity. We also tested the surrogate capacity of dead wood. A species and dead wood inventory was conducted in forest sites in a boreal forest region in central Sweden. Overall, the correlations in species richness between taxa were weak, but some were statistically significant, i.e. those between red-listed lichens and red-listed bryophytes. Beetles were weakly positively correlated with bryophytes, but never with lichens. None of the tested taxa provided a reliable surrogate for representing the other taxa. However, dead wood diversity did represent saproxylic beetles and bryophytes better than random selection and might therefore function as a conservation surrogate for those taxa. Beta-diversity differed significantly between the taxa; lichens had the lowest, while beetles had the highest. Altogether beetles showed low association with the other taxa but high beta-diversity, which implies that they may require specific conservation planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available