4.0 Article

Evolutionary History of the South American Mistletoe Tripodanthus (Loranthaceae) Using Nuclear and Plastid Markers

Journal

SYSTEMATIC BOTANY
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 218-225

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT TAXONOMISTS
DOI: 10.1600/036364412X616783

Keywords

Amphiphagy; Andes; Brazil; biogeography; host plant; parasitic plant; Santalales

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Spanish Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas [CGL2006-00300/BOS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tripodanthus consists of three species that are endemic to South America. While T. acutifolius and T. flagellaris have east-west distributions in tropical and subtropical South America, T. belmirensis is restricted to its type locality in the region of Belmira, Colombia. The objective of the present study was to reconstruct the phylogeny of the genus using molecular markers (nrDNA ITS and plastid atpB-rbcL and trnL-F regions) and to examine morphological characters in the variable species T. acutifolius. A total of 23 individuals of Tripodanthus, representing all species currently recognized in the genus, were sampled in the molecular phylogeny, while 73 individuals were measured for the morphological component of this study. Phylogenetic analyses of the combined ITS and plastid markers reconstructed two main clades within T. acutifolius that correspond to two geographic areas: the Andes and the eastern region of southern South America. This analysis also yielded a monophyletic T. flagellaris, although no geographic structure was obtained within this clade. Tripodanthus belmirensis and T. acutifolius together formed a clade that was sister to T. flagellaris. A principal component analysis of 70 individuals of T. acutifolius showed great variability in leaf morphological characters, leading to overlapping clusters for Andean and eastern mistletoes. The morphologically variable T. acutifolius was not well supported as monophyletic and possessed overlapping morphological features with T. belmirensis, calling into question whether T. belmirensis should be recognized as a distinct species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available