4.0 Review

Elusive Relationships Within Order Fabales: Phylogenetic Analyses Using matK and rbcL Sequence Data

Journal

SYSTEMATIC BOTANY
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 102-114

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT TAXONOMISTS
DOI: 10.1600/036364409787602348

Keywords

Leguminosae; macroevolution; Polygalaceae; Quillajaceae; radiation; Surianaceae

Funding

  1. AlBan
  2. European Union Programme of High Level Scholarships for Latin America [E04D040438CO]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [0907810] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The order Fabales, including Leguminosae, Polygalaceae, Quillajaceae and Surianaceae, represents a novel hypothesis emerging from angiosperm molecular phylogenies. Despite good support for the order, molecular studies to date have suggested contradictory, poorly supported interfamilial relationships. Our reappraisal of relationships within Fabales addresses past taxon sampling deficiencies, and employs parsimony and Bayesian approaches using sequences from the plastid regions rbcL (166 spp.) and matK (78 spp.). Five alternative hypotheses for interfamilial relationships within Fabales were recovered. The Shimodaira-Hasegawa test found the likelihood of a resolved topology significantly higher than the one calculated for a polytomy, but did not favour any of the alternative hypotheses of relationship within Fabales. In the light of the morphological evidence available and the comparative behavior of rbcL and matK, the topology recovering Polygalaceae as sister to the rest of the order Fabales with Leguminosae more closely related to Quillajaceae + Surianaceae, is considered the most likely hypothesis of interfamilial relationships of the order. Dating of selected crown clades in the Fabales phylogeny using penalized likelihood suggests rapid radiation of the Leguminosae, Polygalaceae, and (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae) crown clades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available