4.0 Article

Phylogenetic Studies in the Paniceae (Poaceae-Panicoideae): Ocellochloa, a New Genus from the New World

Journal

SYSTEMATIC BOTANY
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 684-692

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT TAXONOMISTS
DOI: 10.1600/036364409790139655

Keywords

ndhF; Ocellochloa; Paniceae; phylogeny; taxonomic revision

Funding

  1. ANPCyT (Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnica, Argentina) [11739, 13374, 32640]
  2. CONICET [5453]
  3. National Geographic Society [7792-05]
  4. Myndel Botanica Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present contribution continues a critical revision of Panicum, particularly with the delimitation of incertae sedis taxa. A phylogenetic analysis of Paniceae based on cpDNA sequence data (ndhF) was performed with special emphasis on section Stolonifera of Panicum. Fourteen sequences of species of sect. Stolonifera and Echinolaena were added to a panicoid grass matrix previously published giving a total of 140 sequences. As a result, Ocellochloa is here described as a new genus including 12 new combinations: O. andreana, O. biglandularis, O. brachystachya, O. chapadensis, O. craterifera, O. irregularis, O. latissima, O. piauiensis, O. pulchella, O. rudis, O. soderstromii, and O. stolonifera. The position of Panicum venezuelae, previously placed in section Stolonifera with the above mentioned species, clearly indicates that this species is not closely related to the Ocellochloa clade. This conclusion is supported by several morphological characters, such as the presence of axillary inflorescences, cleistogamous spikelets, and glands of the lower lemma depressed, not crateriform. Ocellochloa differs from Panicum s. s. by the unilateral spikelet disposition, the smooth surface of the upper anthecium, and a C-3 photosynthetic pathway. This new genus is described and compared with other allied genera of the Paniceae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available