4.6 Article

Dating Primate Divergences through an Integrated Analysis of Palaeontological and Molecular Data

Journal

SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages 16-31

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syq054

Keywords

Approximate Bayesian computation; molecular phylogeny; palaeontological data; primate divergence

Funding

  1. Biotechnological and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RR03037]
  3. Cancer Research UK [19556] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estimation of divergence times is usually done using either the fossil record or sequence data from modern species. We provide an integrated analysis of palaeontological and molecular data to give estimates of primate divergence times that utilize both sources of information. The number of preserved primate species discovered in the fossil record, along with their geological age distribution, is combined with the number of extant primate species to provide initial estimates of the primate and anthropoid divergence times. This is done by using a stochastic forwards-modeling approach where speciation and fossil preservation and discovery are simulated forward in time. We use the posterior distribution from the fossil analysis as a prior distribution on node ages in a molecular analysis. Sequence data from two genomic regions (CFTR on human chromosome 7 and the CYP7A1 region on chromosome 8) from 15 primate species are used with the birth-death model implemented in mcmctree in PAML to infer the posterior distribution of the ages of 14 nodes in the primate tree. We find that these age estimates are older than previously reported dates for all but one of these nodes. To perform the inference, a new approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) algorithm is introduced, where the structure of the model can be exploited in an ABC-within-Gibbs algorithm to provide a more efficient analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available