4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

DNA is an efficient booster of dendritic cell-based vaccine

Journal

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages 1927-1935

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1020265

Keywords

DNA vaccine; mice; dendritic cells; peptide

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NCI/NIH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DC-based therapeutic vaccines as a promising strategy against chronic infections and cancer have been validated in several clinical trials. However, DC-based vaccines are complex and require many in vitro manipulations, which makes this a personalized and expensive therapeutic approach. In contrast, DNA-based vaccines have many practical advantages including simplicity, low cost of manufacturing and potent immunogenicity already proven in non-human primates and humans. In this study, we explored whether DC-based vaccines can be simplified by the addition of plasmid DNA as prime or boost to achieve robust CD8-mediated immune responses. We compared the cellular immunity induced in BALB/c and C57BL/6mice by DC vaccines, loaded either with peptides or optimized SIV Env DNA, and plasmid DNA-based vaccines delivered by electroporation (EP). We found that mature DC loaded with peptides (P-mDC) induced the highest CD8(+) T cell responses in both strains of mice, but those responses were significantly higher in the C57BL/6model. A heterologous prime-boost strategy (P-DC prime-DNA boost) induced CD8(+) T cell responses similar to those obtained by the P-DC vaccine. Importantly, this strategy elicited robust polyfunctional T cells as well as highest antigen-specific central memory CD8+ T cells in C57BL/6mice, suggesting long-term memory responses. These results indicate that a DC-based vaccine in combination with DNA in a heterologous DC prime-DNA boost strategy has potential as a repeatedly administered vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available