4.7 Review

Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 497-512

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-013-0208-6

Keywords

Transformational sustainability science; Visions; Visioning; Sustainable futures; Methodology; Participatory research

Funding

  1. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  2. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0951366] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Envisioning how a desirable future might look is a long-standing effort in human evolution and social change. Utopian thought and visions provide direction for actions and behavior; more so, they create identity and community. Accordingly, the discourse on sustainability and sustainable development has recognized that positive visions about our societies' future are an influential, if not indispensable, stimulus for change. Visioning is, thus, considered a key method in sustainability research and problem solving, for instance, in transformational sustainability science or in planning for urban sustainability. Yet, quality criteria for sustainability visions and guidelines on how to rigorously craft such visions are scattered over different strands of the literature and some are insufficiently developed. The goal of this article is to review and synthesize such quality criteria and design guidelines to inform sustainability visioning methodology. The review provides a concise reference framework for sustainability students, researchers, and professionals on how to enhance their sustainability visioning practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available