4.5 Review

The Changing Conceptual Basis of Trabeculectomy: A Review of Past and Current Surgical Techniques

Journal

SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 1-25

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2011.07.005

Keywords

trabeculectomy; nonpenetration of the anterior chamber; antimetabolites; bleb complications; filtration surgery; complications of trabeculectomy; trabecular meshwork; Schlemm's canal

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The original intent of glaucoma surgery was to allow aqueous humor to exit more easily either through the sclera or into the suprachoroidal space. The former came to be called, generically, a glaucoma filtering procedure. As this surgery evolved, some explored the concept of lowering pressure without producing a hole in the sclera, with its resultant filtering bleb. For example, Cairns hoped that cutting open the edges of Schlemm's canal would allow aqueous to leave without producing a filtering bleb; however, it became apparent that Cairns's trabeculectomy only worked when a filtering bleb developed. The goal of today's trabeculectomy is the creation of a longlasting transscleral fistula. In fact, trabeculectomy is a misnomer as excision of trabecular meshwork is unimportant. Frequently, the tissue excised to create a trans-scleral fistula is sclera, cornea, or both. The current trabeculectomy is really a guarded sclerokeratectomy. Newer techniques hope to increase aqueous outflow through Schlemm's canal to avoid complications associated with subconjunctival filtering blebs. Non-penetrating glaucoma surgeries (deep sclerectomy, viscocanalostomy) and ab intern trabecular surgery attempt to lower intraocular pressure with bleb-less procedures. We describe the recent evolution of glaucoma surgery, particularly the idea that intraocular pressure may be lowered satisfactorily without creating a filtering bleb. (Surv Ophdialmol 57:1-25, 2012. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available