4.5 Review

Systemic and Ocular Safety of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapies for Ocular Neovascular Disease

Journal

SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 95-113

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.08.006

Keywords

bevacizumab; ocular neovascular diseases; pegaptanib; ranibizumab; safety; vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor

Categories

Funding

  1. Genentech
  2. Eyetech
  3. Novartis
  4. Pfizer
  5. Pfizer Inc
  6. (OSI) Eyetech, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The treatment of ocular neovascular diseases is being revolutionized by intravitreal therapies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Two agents are approved for treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration and are being evaluated for other retinal conditions: the RNA aptamer pegaptanib and the monoclonal antibody antigen-binding fragment ranibizumab. Bevacizumab, a related antibody, is being used similarly, although its use is off-label. Pegaptanib selectively binds to a VEGF isoform identified as being especially pathogenic in the eye and spares other isoforms, whereas the other two agents nonselectively bind all VEGF isoforms. Because VEGF is involved in a wide variety of physiologic processes, the ocular and systemic safety of anti-VEGF agents is of paramount concern. I provide an overview of safety data for intravitreal anti-VEGF therapies, focusing primarily on randomized, controlled trials. For pegaptanib, an accumulation of data from pivotal trials and a dedicated systemic safety study have revealed no ocular or systemic safety concerns. For ranibizumab, the principal ocular adverse event detected in clinical trials was a low frequency of ocular inflammation, and systemic adverse events included a slightly elevated risk of nonocular hemorrhage and stroke. Safety data from properly designed randomized controlled trials for bevacizumab are not available. (Surv Ophthalmol 56:95-113, 2011. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available