4.1 Article

What is Appropriate Procedure for Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Patients With Obstructive Jaundice Awaiting Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182318d2f

Keywords

pancreaticoduodenectomy; cholangiopancreatography; endoscopic retrograde; percutaneous biliary drainage

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The aims of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes of the preoperative drainage methods in patients with obstructive jaundice awaiting panreaticoduodenectomy and to determine, which procedure would be more effective for preoperative drainage. Methods: Among 239 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer, 77 with obstructive jaundice underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD, n = 34) or endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD, n = 43). Results: Median rate of decrease in bilirubin was 0.65 mg/d in PTBD group and 0.34 mg/d in EBD group (P = 0.003). Median interval from preoperative drainage to pancreaticoduodenectomy were 11 days in PTBD group and 18 days in EBD group ( P - 0.009). Overall indwelling catheter-related complication rates were higher in EBD group compared with PTBD group (23.3% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.019). No catheter occlusion developed in PTBD group, but 6 stent occlusions (13.3%) developed in EBD group (P = 0.031). The mortality rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Percutaneous biliary drainage may be preferred for preoperative drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice awaiting pancreaticoduodenectomy due to rapid biliary decompression and lower frequency of catheter-related complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available