4.7 Article

SimpleTree-An Efficient Open Source Tool to Build Tree Models from TLS Clouds

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 4245-4294

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f6114245

Keywords

biomass; density; volume; TLS; forestry; tree; stem; branch; point cloud; open source; software

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the Lin2Value project [033L049A]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  3. Ludwigs University Freiburg in the funding programme Open Access Publishing
  4. NERC [nceo020002] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [nceo020002] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An open source tool named SimpleTree, capable of modelling highly accurate cylindrical tree models from terrestrial laser scan point clouds, is presented and evaluated. All important functionalities, accessible in the software via buttons and dialogues, are described including the explanation of all necessary input parameters. The method is validated utilizing 101 point clouds of six different tree species, in the main evergreen and coniferous trees. All scanned trees have been destructively harvested to get accurate estimates of above ground biomass with which we assess the accuracy of the SimpleTree-reconstructed cylinder models. The trees were grouped into four data sets and for each one a Concordance Correlation Coefficient of at least 0.92 (0.92, 0.97, 0.92, 0.94) and an total relative error at most approximate to 8 % (2.42%, 3.59%, -4.59%, 8.27%) was achieved in the comparison of the model results to the ground truth data. A global statistical improvement of derived cylinder radii is presented as well as an efficient optimization approach to automatically improve user given input parameters. An additional check of the SimpleTree results is presented via comparison to the results of trees reconstructed using an alternative, published method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available