4.6 Article

Improved insulin sensitivity after gastric bypass correlates with decreased total body fat, but not with changes in free fatty acids

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3338-0

Keywords

Bariatric surgery; Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Free fatty acid; Insulin sensitivity; Insulin resistance; Total body fat; Adiposity

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [K23 DK075907] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased plasma free fatty acids (FFAs) are considered one of the key elements in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance (IR) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We hypothesize that, in diabetic patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), a postoperative decrease in FFA will correlate with improved insulin sensitivity (Si). A total of 30 obese [body mass index ((BMI) > 35 kg/m(2)] patients with a diagnosis of T2DM were studied preoperatively and 12 months after LRYGB in a prospective cohort study. Collected data included intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT), total body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and plasma levels of FFA. Si analysis from the IVGTT was estimated from minimal model analysis. Pre- and postoperative variables were compared using a paired sample t test. Relationships between changes in variables were determined with Pearson's correlation test. Twelve months after LRYGB the study population showed a significant decrease in BMI (p = 0.001), FFA (p = 0.03), and total body fat (p = 0.03), with an increase in Si (p = 0.001). Postoperative changes in Si significantly correlated (Pearson's r = -0.53, p = 0.01) with change in total body fat, but not with changes in plasma FFA (Pearson's r = -0.22, p = 0.31). Our study challenges the notion that IR is mediated to a significant degree by changes in plasma FFA concentration. Instead, changes in adiposity and consequently changes in adipokine release can be the key players in determining remission of T2DM after LRYGB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available