4.6 Article

Metabonomic profiling: A novel approach in neuroendocrine neoplasias

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages 1185-1192

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.018

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Dr Heinz-Horst Deichmann Foundation [P31294]
  2. European Union [300586]
  3. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Tissue Bank
  4. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London
  5. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [AMS-SGCL8-Kinross] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. A metabonomic phenotyping strategy was developed as part of a pilot study to define a diagnostic metabolic phenotype for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). Methods. Twenty-eight patients with MEN were prospectively recruited: small bowel MEN,.n = 8; panthwatic MEN, n = 10; and others, n = 10 (mean age 49.4 years [26-81] male/female ratio 17:11). There were 17 healthy control patients. Urine samples were subjected to 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic profiling via the Use of a Bruker Avance 600-MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany). Acquired spectral data were imported into SIMGA and MATLAB for supervised and unsupervised multivariate analysis. Results. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis differentiated between MEN and healthy samples with accuracy (R2Y = 0.79, Q2Y = 0.53, area under the curve [AUG] 0.90). Orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis was able to distinguish between small bowel MEN and pancreatic MEN (R2Y = 0.91, Q2Y = 0.35). Subclass analysis also demonstrated class separation between functional and nonfunctional MEN (R2Y = 0.98, Q2Y = 0.77, AUG 0.6) and those with metastases (1?2Y = 0.72,. Q2 Y = 0.41, AUG 0.86) due to variations in kippurate metabolism (P <.0001). Conclusion. Metabonomic analysis suggests that subgroups of.NEN may possess a stratified metabolic phenotype. Metabolic profiling could provide novel biomarkers for MEN

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available