4.6 Article

Role of p53, Bax, p21, and DNA-PKcs in radiation sensitivity of HCT-116 cells and xenografts

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 154, Issue 2, Pages 143-151

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.03.012

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Surgery at UTSW
  2. NCI [U24 CA126608]
  3. Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center through an NCI Cancer Center [1P30 CA142543-01]
  4. Department of Radiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Molecular factors that dictate tumor response to ionizing,radiation in rectal cancer are not well described. Methods. We investigated the contribution of p53, p21, Bax, and DNA-PKcs in response to ionizing radiation in an isogeneic colorectal cancer system in vitro and in vivo. Results. HCT-116 DNA-PKcs(-/-) cells and xenografts were radiosensitive compared with wild-type (WT) HCT-116 cells. HCT-116 p53(-/-) cells and tumor xenografts displayed a radioresistant phenotype; Separately, p21 or Bax deficiency was associated with a radiosensitive phenotype in vitro and in vivo. In vivo, Bax deficiency led to increased tumor necrosis and decreased microvessel density. In vitro, HCT-116 Bax(-/-) cells had decreased levels of vascular endothelial growth factor HCT-116 WT cells had a more radioresistant phenotype after pancaspase inhibition, but pancaspase inhibition did not alter radiosensitivity in HCT-116 Bax-/- cells subjected to ionizing radiation. There was no difference in cell growth in HCT-116 WT cells subjected to transient apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) inhibition; however, HCT-116 Bax(-/-) cells treated with AIF siRNA followed by ionizing radiation had a significant survival advantage compared with control-treated cells, implicating AIF in the radiosensitivity of Bax(-/-) cells. Conclusion. These data might be used along with other markers to predict response to radiation in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available