4.6 Article

Accuracy of 4-dimensional computed tomography in poorly localized patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 148, Issue 6, Pages 1129-1137

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.09.002

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) utilizes multiplanar images and, perfusion characteristics to identify abnormal parathyroid glands. We assessed the role of 4D-CT in patients with inconclusive preoperative ultrasound and sestamibi localization studies. Methods. Adult patients with primary hyperparathyroidism with negative or discordant standard imaging who underwent both localization with 4D-CT and operative intervention for curative intent were included. Patient characteristics, 4D-CT scan results compared with operative findings, and curative proportion were assessed. Results. Of the 60 patients, 4D-CT accurately lateralized 73% and localized 60% of abnormal glands found at operation. Single candidate lesions (46/60) were confirmed at operation in 70%. When multiple lesions were identified on 4D-CT (14/60), accuracy dropped to 29% (P = .03). The accuracy of 4D-CT was not different between primary and reoperative cases (P =. 79). Of the 8 patients with multigland disease diagnosed perioperatively, 5 had multiple candidate lesions noted on 4D-CT In 94% (48/51) of patients, a > 50% drop in intraoperative parathormone (IOPTH) level was achieved after resection and 87% (48/55) had long-term cure with a median follow-up of 221 days. Conclusion. 4D-CT identifies the more than half of abnormal parathyroids missed by traditional imaging and should be considered in cases with negative or discordant sestamibi and ultrasound. Bilateral exploration is warranted when multiple candidate lesions are reported on 4D-CT Multigland disease remains a challenging entity. (Surgery 2010;148:1129-38.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available