4.4 Article

Characterization of 1T-TiSe2 surface by means of STM and XPD experiments and model calculations

Journal

SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 606, Issue 23-24, Pages 1760-1770

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2012.06.008

Keywords

Surface structure; Titanium diselenide; Scanning tunneling microscopy; Photoelectron holography; X-ray photoelectron diffraction; Surface relaxation

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [10-03-96047, 11-03-00063]
  2. Presidium of the Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences [12-M-23-2010, 12-P-3-1015, 12-U-3-1006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and X-ray photoelectron diffraction (XPD) are applied to study the surface of layered dichalcogenide 1T-TiSe2. XPD pattern simulation for the 1T-TiSe2 surface is performed in the approach of electron multiple scattering within the EDAC code: considered are models of structural defects in the 1T-TiSe2 lattice, relaxation contraction (expansion) of surface layers and van der Waals gap, and deviation of the 1T-TiSe2 surface geometry from the basal plane (001). The atomic structure of 1T-TiSe2 surface layers is reconstructed from the XPD pattern on Se(LMM) and Ti2p core level using the photoelectron holography scattering pattern extraction algorithm with maximum entropy method (SPEA-MEM). The results of the 3D reconstruction are in agreement with the XPD pattern simulation data. In both cases, the TiSe2 surface corresponds to 1T polytype; an increase is observed in the parameter a(0) and in the van der Waals gap between two surface slabs. It is assumed that similar structural distortions of the 1T-TiSe2 lattice lead to the formation of an energy gap between the valence band and the conduction band of titanium diselenide, which was observed earlier by photoemission spectroscopy and follows from the theoretical calculations. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available