4.4 Article

Adsorption structure and bonding of trimesic acid on Cu(100)

Journal

SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 605, Issue 23-24, Pages 1968-1978

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2011.07.015

Keywords

Copper; Carboxylic acid; Surface structure, morphology, roughness, and topography; Self-assembly; Scanning tunneling microscopy; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [320019, 330018]
  2. National Technology Agency of Finland [210031, 230048, 230053]
  3. Outokumpu Oyj Foundation
  4. Vaisala Foundation
  5. National Graduate School in Materials Physics
  6. European Community through Integrated Infrastructure Initiative
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [320019, 320019] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combining scanning tunneling microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and X-ray absorption spectroscopy using synchrotron radiation, we have studied the adsorption and growth of trimesic acid (TMA, 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid, C6H3(COOH)(3)) on Cu(100) in a wide range of coverages (from submonolayer to multilayer ones) at room temperature and after subsequent annealing. A series of coverage-dependent TMA structures, transitions between these structures, and their properties are characterized, demonstrating the interplay between the bonding, orientation, and deprotonation reaction of adsorbed species. In particular, it is shown that the degree of deprotonation in TMA overlayers depends on the amount of deposited molecules non-monotonously, and that such behavior is well consistent with the formation mechanism proposed for the TMA/Cu(100) system. The results provide a good platform for further understanding of non-covalent interactions and self-assembly phenomena underlying the growth of supramolecular nanoassemblies of aromatic carboxylic (benzenecarboxylic) acids on metallic substrates. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available