4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

The isotopic comparative method (ICM) for SIMS quantification of boron in silicon up to 40 at.%

Journal

SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS
Volume 43, Issue 1-2, Pages 36-40

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/sia.3629

Keywords

SIMS; matrix effects; ion yield; quantification; boron; silicon

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency, ANR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work extends the Isotopic Comparative Method, which has been previously introduced with the aim of correcting matrix effects, to quantify high concentrations of boron in silicon up to 40 at.% by SIMS technique. It requires a specific sample containing two isotopes of the element to quantify: for this study silicon sample with isotope B-10 present in constant, sufficiently dilute concentration, quantifiable with the conventional Relative Sensitivity Factor method and the other isotope B-11 implanted at very high concentrations. The intensity of B-10, whose concentration ratio with respect to silicon is known and constant, allows to measure the matrix effects induced by the presence of B-11 and to deduce the total boron concentration. The variations of the ion yields of boron Y-B(+) and silicon Y-Si(+) as a function of the boron concentration C-B are investigated up to 40 at. %. It is found that under Ar+ sputtering there are no matrix effects on Si+ ions, but a doubling of Y-B(+). Under O-2(+), Y-B(+) and Y-Si(+) increases almost linearly and similarly up to 2.5 times their value in dilute regime. With saturated O-2 flooding under Ar+ or O-2(+), Y-B(+) and Y-Si(+) increase similarly and weakly. These results allow defining an Extended Relative Sensibility Factor method for the quantification of concentrated boron profiles in silicon. It has been successfully implemented in a similar to 5 at.% boron layer obtained by Gas Immersion Laser Doping. ICM has been implemented for quantifying high dose boron implantation in silicon (C-B up to 40 at.%). Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available