4.7 Article

Characterization of pulse reverse Ni-Mo coatings on Cu substrate

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 238, Issue -, Pages 158-164

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.10.065

Keywords

Ni-Mo alloys; Pulse reverse method; Chemical composition; Morphology; Crystal structure

Funding

  1. Research Council of Sharif University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of pulse reverse current (PRC) method on Ni-Mo coatings electroplated from chloride solution was investigated by various plating parameters such as plating duration, the anodic duty cycle, the anodic current density and the cathodic current density. By increasing the anodic duty cycle and anodic current density, the Mo content of coatings reached 68 wt.% and 78 wt.%, respectively at cathodic current densities of 500 and 300 mA cm(-2). The Mo content of coatings increases by the preferential dissolution of Ni on the anodic pulse and also by the replenishment of Mo complexes in the diffusion layer near the substrate surface during the anodic pulse. In comparison with the direct current (DC) and the pulse current (PC) methods, the PRC method deposited coatings having grain-refined morphology and more porosity especially at the anodic current density of 200 mA cm-2. This is related to preferential dissolution of the high stress zones and the increase of Mo oxide. The PRC method made coatings with the crystallite size of 125 angstrom which is less than 287 angstrom crystallite size of coatings deposited by the PC method. Moreover, the PRC method made coatings with a higher crystalline state than coatings deposited by the DC method. The chemical composition, the surface morphology and the crystal structure of all deposited Ni-Mo coatings were evaluated by atomic adsorption spectroscopy (AAS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) methods, respectively. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available