4.7 Article

TBC bond coat-top coat interface roughness: Influence on fatigue life and modelling aspects

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 236, Issue -, Pages 230-238

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.09.051

Keywords

Thermal barrier coating; TBC; Thermal cycling fatigue; Interface; Roughness; Ra

Funding

  1. Swedish Energy Agency
  2. Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery AB
  3. GKN Aerospace Engine Systems
  4. Royal Institute of Technology through the Swedish research programme TURBO POWER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs), when used in gas turbines, may fail through thermal fatigue, causing the ceramic top coat to spall off the metallic bond coat. The life prediction of TBCs often involves finite element modelling of the stress field close to the bond coat/top coat interface and thus relies on accurate modelling of the interface. The present research studies the influence of bond coat/top coat interface roughness on the thermal fatigue life of plasma sprayed TBCs. By using different spraying parameters, specimens with varying interface roughnesses were obtained. During thermal cycling it was found that higher interface roughness promoted longer thermal fatigue life. The interfaces were characterised by roughness parameters, such as Ra, Rq and R Delta q, as well as by autocorrelation, material ratio curves and slope distribution. The variation of spray parameters was found to affect amplitude parameters, such as Ra, but not spacing parameters, such as RSm. Three different interface geometries were tried for finite element crack growth simulation: cosine, ellipse and triangular shapes. The cosine model was found to be an appropriate interface model and a procedure for obtaining the necessary parameters, amplitude and wavelength, was suggested. The positive effect of high roughness on life was suggested to be due to a shift from predominantly interface failure, for low roughness, to predominantly top coat failure, for high roughness. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available