4.7 Article

High temperature tribological behavior of W-DLC against aluminum

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 206, Issue 7, Pages 1905-1912

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.08.002

Keywords

Diamond like carbon; Wear mechanisms; Coefficient of friction; Material transfer; W-DLC; Tungsten oxide

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. GM of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diamond-like carbon (DLC) coatings are well suited for applications that require minimum adhesion and low coefficient of friction (COF) against aluminum alloys. These properties however deteriorate rapidly at elevated temperatures, and coating wear occurs. In this study, tribological behavior of W containing DLC (W-DLC) were studied as a function of testing temperatures up to 500 degrees C, and the sliding-induced surface and subsurface damage at these temperatures was investigated. Pin-on-disk tests performed on W-DLC run against 319 Al showed a low COF of 0.2 at 25 degrees C. whereas between 100 degrees C and 300 degrees C, a high average steady-state COF of 0.60 was recorded. At 400 degrees C the COF decreased to 0.18, and this reduction in COF continued with increasing the temperature to 500 degrees C (0.12). It was observed that the formation of transferred material layers on 319Al was the governing mechanism for the low COF. The Raman analysis revealed that at room temperature these layers were rich in carbon, whereas at 400 degrees C the transfer layers consisted of tungsten oxide. According to transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), of the coatings tested at 400 degrees C and 500 degrees C a thin (20 nm) tungsten oxide layer was formed on their top surface. This in turn led to the formation of tungsten oxide rich transfer layers that is believed to reduce the COF at temperatures above 400 degrees C. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available