4.7 Article

Effect of carbide degradation in a Ni-based hardfacing under abrasive and combined impact/abrasive conditions

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 206, Issue 6, Pages 1062-1068

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.07.064

Keywords

Tribology; Carbide degradation; Ni-based; Hardfacing; Abrasion; Impact

Funding

  1. Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG)
  2. TecNet Capital GmbH (Province of Niederosterreich)
  3. Austrian Center of Competence for Tribology (AC2T research GmbH)
  4. Busatis GmbH
  5. Castolin Ges.m.b.H.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Within this work, the effect of carbide degradation in a WC/W2C reinforced Ni-based hardfacing was assessed under abrasive and combined impact/abrasive conditions. In view of the above, a WC/W2C reinforced Ni-based hardfacing was deposited by plasma transferred arc (PTA) welding using different welding currents. Microstructure was characterised by quantitative metallography to determine specific structural parameters: mean carbide diameter and carbide area fraction. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were also used to characterise carbide dissolution mechanism. Tribological behaviour was determined with a 3-body abrasion test according to ASTM G65 and with a cyclic impact/abrasion test (CIAT). Results showed significant carbide degradation with increasing welding current, resulting in a significant reduced primary carbide content and carbide diameter. Reduced carbide content indicated a significantly wear rate increase under pure 3-body abrasion conditions. Specific wear energy was determined under pure abrasive condition and showed significant dependence on the primary carbide content. However, wear rates under combined impact/abrasion were at constant level due to the reduction of the brittle primary carbide content. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available