4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The effect of the microstructure and the surface topography on the electrical properties of thin Ag films deposited by high power pulsed magnetron sputtering

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 202, Issue 11, Pages 2323-2327

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.028

Keywords

HPPMS; HiPIMS; silver films; conductivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work thin silver (Ag) films are grown employing high power pulsed magnetron sputtering (HPPMS) for various pulse on/off time configurations, as well as by dc magnetron sputtering (dcMS), for reference. It is shown that the increase of the pulse off-time from 450 mu s to 3450 mu s, while the pulse on-time is kept constant at 50 mu s, results in an increase of the peak target current (I-Tp) from 3 A to 22 A. The increase of I-Tp is accompanied by an increase of the ion flux towards the growing film. This is particularly pronounced for I-Tp > 11 A. The microstructure, the surface topography and the electrical properties of Ag films grown at I-Tp = 11 A, I-Tp = 22 A and by dcMS are investigated, as a function of the film thickness d. It is shown that for d > 20 nin the electrical resistivity of films sputtered at I-Tp=22 A is similar to that of films grown by dcMS. Slightly higher values are measured for films grown at I-Tp = 11A. It is found that in this thickness range the film conductivity is strongly affected by the vertical grain size and the scattering of the charged carriers at the film interfaces. For d < 15 nm the resistivity of films deposited at I-Tp = 22 A is substantially lower as compared to that of films grown by dcMS. Films deposited at I-Tp = 11 A exhibit also in this case a higher conductivity. In this thickness regime the electronic transport and, thus the conductivity are profoundly determined by the surface topography and the film density. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available