4.3 Article

Enhanced liquid-liquid anion exchange using macrocyclic anion receptors: effect of receptor structure on sulphate-nitrate exchange selectivity

Journal

SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
Volume 22, Issue 11-12, Pages 653-671

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10610271003763263

Keywords

liquid-liquid anion exchange; anion binding; macrocycle; calixpyrrole; equilibrium model; extraction

Funding

  1. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences, Office Basic Energy Sciences, US Department of Energy
  2. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-04ER63741, DE-FG02-01ER15186, DE-FG02-04ER63745]
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-0316623]
  4. University of Malaga (Junta de Andalucia) [P09-TEP-5369]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When certain macrocyclic anion receptors are added to a chloroform solution of the nitrate form of a lipophilic quaternary ammonium salt (methyltri-C8,10-ammonium nitrate, Aliquat 336N), the extraction of sulphate from an aqueous sodium nitrate solution via exchange with the organic-phase nitrate is significantly enhanced. Eight macrocycles were surveyed, including two derivatives of a tetraamide macrocycle, five derivatives of calix[4]pyrrole and -decafluorocalix[5]pyrrole. Under the hypothesis that the enhancement originates from sulphate binding by the anion receptors in the chloroform phase, it was possible to obtain reasonable fits to the sulphate distribution survey data based on the formation of 1:1 and 2:1 receptor:sulphate complexes in the chloroform phase. Apparent 1:1 sulphate-binding constants obtained from the model in this system fell in the range [image omitted]. Comparison of the results for the various anion receptors included in this study reveals that sulphate binding is sensitive to the nature of the substituents on the parent macrocycle scaffolds in a way that does not follow straightforwardly from simple chemical expectations, such as electron-withdrawing effects on hydrogen-bond donor strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available