4.6 Review

Hepatitis B virus management to prevent reactivation after chemotherapy: a review

Journal

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 2999-3008

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1576-7

Keywords

Hepatitis B virus; Reactivation; Chemotherapy; Cancer; Review

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health through MD Anderson's Cancer Center [CA016672]
  2. National Cancer Institute [K07CA132955]
  3. American Gastroenterological Association Foundation-Sucampo-ASP Designated Research Award in Geriatric Gastroenterology
  4. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [K23DK090303]
  5. T. Franklin Williams Scholarship Award
  6. Atlantic Philanthropies, Inc
  7. John A. Hartford Foundation
  8. Association of Specialty Professors
  9. American Gastroenterological Association
  10. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  11. Gilead Sciences
  12. Roche
  13. Merck
  14. Daiichi Sankyo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after chemotherapy can lead to liver failure and death. Conflicting recommendations regarding HBV screening in cancer patients awaiting chemotherapy mean that some patients at risk for HBV reactivation are not being identified and treated with prophylactic antiviral therapy. We performed a narrative review of the existing evidence regarding screening for and management of HBV infection among patients with cancer using Ovid Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Our review showed inconsistencies in the definition and management strategies for HBV reactivation. The timeframe of reactivation is variable, and its molecular mechanisms are not clear. There are five effective antiviral agents that can be used as prophylaxis to prevent reactivation of HBV infection in cancer patients; however, the optimal drug and duration of therapy are unknown. Reactivation is more commonly reported in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving rituximab treatment, but reactivation can occur after other chemotherapies and in patients with solid tumors. Screening with all three screening tests-HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs-allows the most thorough interpretation of a patient's serologic profile and assessment of reactivation risk; however, decision-making and cost-effectiveness studies are needed to determine optimal screening strategies. Prevention of reactivation of HBV infection depends on identification of patients at risk and initiation of antiviral prophylaxis, but data to guide screening and treatment strategies are lacking. Additional research is necessary to accurately define and predict reactivation, identify best antiviral treatment strategies, and identify cost-effective HBV screening strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available