4.5 Article

Updating and validation of the dynamic model of a railway viaduct with precast deck

Journal

STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 1484-1509

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2013.833950

Keywords

railway viaduct; ambient vibration test; dynamic test under railway traffic; finite element model calibration; genetic algorithm; experimental validation

Funding

  1. FEDER funds through the program 'Programa Operacional Fatores de Competitividade - COMPETE'
  2. Portuguese national funds through the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [PTDC/ECM/68430/2006]
  3. agency 'AdI - Agencia da Inovacao' [SI-IDT-3440/2008]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/ECM/68430/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes the calibration and experimental validation of the dynamic model of a railway viaduct with precast deck. Global modal parameters of the structure and local modal parameters of the upper slab of the deck are identified based on a dynamic test. The calibration of the numerical model is done using a genetic algorithm that allows obtaining optimal values of 11 parameters of the numerical model. The inclusion of local modal parameters proved to be crucial, as various parameters of the numerical model do not have significant influence on global modal parameters. Mode pairing between numerical and experimental vibration modes is performed using a recent technique based on modal strain energy. The experimental validation of the calibrated numerical model is done by the comparison between numerical responses and experimental responses obtained in a dynamic test under railway traffic. This dynamic test shows the existence of a nonlinear behaviour of the viaduct's supports. There is an excellent correlation between numerical and experimental responses for different train speeds with the adjustment of the longitudinal supports stiffness of the calibrated model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available