4.5 Article

A sensor-driven structural health prognosis procedure considering sensor performance degradation

Journal

STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages 764-776

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2011.614259

Keywords

sensors; fatigue field testing and monitoring; structural reliability; structural safety; degradation; stochastic processes

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1031304]
  2. University of Maryland
  3. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of the P.R. China [2007B49]
  4. Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges of the P.R. China
  5. Chang'an University [CHD2010JC003]
  6. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1031304] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a general framework for sensor-driven structural health prognosis and its application to probabilistic maintenance scheduling. Continuously collected sensor data is used to update the parameters of the stochastic structural degradation model. Uncertainty in sensor data (i.e. measurement error) is explicitly modelled as an evolving stochastic process. The proposed framework utilises Bayesian theorem and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling to calculate the posterior distributions of stochastic parameters of the structural degradation model. Bayesian updating allows the use of dynamic diagnostic information with prior knowledge for improved prognosis including risk analysis and remaining useful life (RUL) estimation. Although the proposed sensor-driven structural health prognosis procedure is illustrated with a fatigue-related example, it is applicable to more general applications such as corrosion and pavement cracking. A case study of the fatigue details found in a prototype steelgirder bridge has been conducted to demonstrate the proposed prognosis and maintenance scheduling procedure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available