4.7 Article

Structure of the Polycomb Group Protein PCGF1 in Complex with BCOR Reveals Basis for Binding Selectivity of PCGF Homologs

Journal

STRUCTURE
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 665-671

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.02.013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Heart Association [0830111N]
  2. American Cancer Society [RSG-08-285-01-GMC]
  3. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program [BC075278]
  4. National Institutes of Health [5R01CA071540]
  5. NIH-NCI [2P30 CA054174-17]
  6. XSEDE [TG-MCB070039]
  7. Welch Foundation [AQ-1399]
  8. UTHSCSA Executive Research Committee
  9. Cancer Therapy Research Center
  10. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  11. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  12. Michigan Economic Development Corporation
  13. Michigan Technology Tr-Corridor [085P1000817]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polycomb-group RING finger homologs (PCGF1, PCGF2, PCGF3, PCGF4, PCGF5, and PCGF6) are critical components in the assembly of distinct Polycomb repression complex 1 (PRC1)-related complexes. Here, we identify a protein interaction domain in BCL6 corepressor, BCOR, which binds the RING finger- and WD40-associated ubiquitin-like (RAWUL) domain of PCGF1 (NSPC1) and PCGF3 but not of PCGF2 (MEL18) or PCGF4 (BMW. Because of the selective binding, we have named this domain PCGF Ub-like fold discriminator (PUFD). The structure of BCOR PUFD bound to PCGF1 reveals that (1) PUFD binds to the same surfaces as observed for a different Polycomb group RAWUL domain and (2) the ability of PUFD to discriminate among RAWULs stems from the identity of specific residues within these interaction surfaces. These data show the molecular basis for determining the binding preference for a PCGF homolog, which ultimately helps determine the identity of the larger PRC1-like assembly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available