4.7 Article

Mapping the nucleotide and isoform-dependent structural and dynamical features of ras proteins

Journal

STRUCTURE
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 885-896

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.03.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [R03 TW007318, R03 TW007318-01A2, R03 TW000768-02, R03 TW007318-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR008605-110052, P41 RR008605, P41 RR006009-150315, P41 RR008605-128884, P41 RR008605-147697, P41 RR008605-120018, P41 RR008605-138229] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM031749-14, R01 GM031749-25, R01 GM031749-24, R01 GM031749-21, R01 GM031749-26, R01 GM031749-20, R01 GM031749, R01 GM031749-22, R01 GM031749-18, R01 GM031749-23, R01 GM031749-19] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ras GTPases are conformational switches controlling cell proliferation, differentiation, and development. Despite their prominent role in many forms of cancer, the mechanism of conformational transition between inactive GDP-bound and active GTP-bound states remains unclear. Here we describe a detailed analysis of available experimental structures and molecular dynamics simulations to quantitatively assess the structural and dynamical features of active and inactive states and their interconversion. We demonstrate that GTP-bound and nucleotide-free G12V H-ras sample a wide region of conformational space, and show that the inactive-to-active transition is a multiphase process defined by the relative rearrangement of the two switches and the orientation of Tyr32. We also modeled and simulated N- and K-ras proteins and found that K-ras is more flexible than N- and H-ras. We identified a number of isoform-specific, long-range side chain interactions that define unique pathways of communication between the nucleotide binding site and the C terminus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available