4.7 Article

Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework

Journal

STRUCTURAL SAFETY
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 24-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.07.002

Keywords

Performance-Based Engineering; Hurricane engineering; Multiple hazards; Windborne debris; Hurricane wind; Residential buildings

Funding

  1. Louisiana Board of Regents [NSF(2008)-PFUND-86]
  2. LSU Council on Research
  3. Longwell's Family Foundation
  4. Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research - MIUR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an innovative fully-probabilistic Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework for risk assessment of structural systems located in hurricane-prone regions. The proposed methodology is based on the total probability theorem and disaggregates the risk assessment into elementary components, namely hazard analysis, structural characterization, environment-structure interaction analysis, structural analysis, damage analysis, and loss analysis. This methodology accounts for the multi-hazard nature of hurricane events by considering both the separate effects of and the interaction among hurricane wind, flood, windborne debris, and rainfall hazards. A discussion on the different sources of hazard is provided, and vectors of intensity measures for hazard analyses are proposed. Suggestions on the selection of appropriate parameters describing the interaction between the environmental actions and the structure, the structural response, and the resulting damage are also provided. The proposed PBHE framework is illustrated through an application example consisting of the performance assessment of a residential building subjected to windborne debris and hurricane strong winds. The PBHE framework introduced in this paper represents a step toward a rational methodology for probabilistic risk assessment and design of structures subjected to multi-hazard scenarios. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available