4.7 Article

Damage classification in structural health monitoring using principal component analysis and self-organizing maps

Journal

STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 1303-1316

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/stc.1540

Keywords

damage classification; damage indices; principal component analysis (PCA); self-organizing maps (SOM); structural health monitoring (SHM)

Funding

  1. 'Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion' in Spain [DPI2011-28033-C03-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Damage classification is an important issue within SHM going beyond the purely damage detection. This paper proposes a data-driven statistical approach for damage classification, which is constructed over a distributed piezoelectric active sensor network for excitation and measurement of vibrational structural responses. At different phases, a single piezoelectric transducer is used as actuator, and the others are used as sensors. An initial baseline model for each phase for the healthy structure is built by applying PCA to the data collected in several experiments. In addition, same experiments are performed with the structure in different states (damaged or not), and the dynamic responses are projected into the different baseline PCA models for each actuator. Some of these projections and damage indices are used as input features for a self-organizing map, which is properly trained and validated to build a pattern baseline model. This baseline is further used as a reference for blind diagnosis tests of structures. Both training/validation and diagnosis modes are experimentally assessed using an aluminum plate instrumented with four piezoelectric transducers. Damages are simulated by adding mass at different positions. Results show that all these damages are successfully classified both in the baseline pattern model and in further diagnosis tests. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available