4.8 Article

Both Chromosome Decondensation and Condensation Are Dependent on DNA Replication in C. elegans Embryos

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 405-417

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.046

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Senior Research award [090944/Z/09/Z]
  2. Wellcome Trust Investigator award
  3. CRUK [C303/A7399, C303/A14301]
  4. MRC [MR/K015869/1]
  5. Wellcome Trust [097045/B/11/Z]
  6. Lister Institute
  7. Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Fund
  8. MRC [MC_UU_12016/13, MR/K015869/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Cancer Research UK [14301] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12016/13, MR/K015869/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Wellcome Trust [102943/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During cell division, chromatin alternates between a condensed state to facilitate chromosome segregation and a decondensed form when DNA replicates. In most tissues, S phase and mitosis are separated by defined G1 and G2 gap phases, but early embryogenesis involves rapid oscillations between replication and mitosis. Using Caenorhabditis elegans embryos as a model system, we show that chromosome condensation and condensin II concentration on chromosomal axes require replicated DNA. In addition, we found that, during late telophase, replication initiates on condensed chromosomes and promotes the rapid decondensation of the chromatin. Upon replication initiation, the CDC-45-MCMGINS (CMG) DNA helicase drives the release of condensin I complexes from chromatin and the activation or displacement of inactive MCM-2-7 complexes, which together with the nucleoporin MEL28/ELYS tethers condensed chromatin to the nuclear envelope, thereby promoting chromatin decondensation. Our results show how, in an early embryo, the chromosome-condensation cycle is functionally linked with DNA replication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available