4.8 Article

FBH1 Catalyzes Regression of Stalled Replication Forks

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 1749-1757

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.028

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  2. Danish Cancer Society
  3. Lundbeck Foundation
  4. Association for International Cancer Research
  5. European Research Council
  6. Nordea Foundation
  7. European Commission project DDResponse, Czech national program of sustainability [LO1304]
  8. Czech Ministry of Interior [VG20102014001]
  9. Villum Kann Rasmussen Fund
  10. Danish National Research Foundation
  11. Danish Medical Research Council
  12. Swiss National Science Foundation
  13. Krebsliga Schweiz
  14. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF12OC0002360] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA replication fork perturbation is a major challenge to the maintenance of genome integrity. It has been suggested that processing of stalled forks might involve fork regression, in which the fork reverses and the two nascent DNA strands anneal. Here, we show that FBH1 catalyzes regression of a model replication fork in vitro and promotes fork regression in vivo in response to replication perturbation. Cells respond to fork stalling by activating checkpoint responses requiring signaling through stress-activated protein kinases. Importantly, we show that FBH1, through its helicase activity, is required for early phosphorylation of ATM substrates such as CHK2 and CtIP as well as hyperphosphorylation of RPA. These phosphorylations occur prior to apparent DNA double-strand break formation. Furthermore, FBH1-dependent signaling promotes checkpoint control and preserves genome integrity. We propose a model whereby FBH1 promotes early checkpoint signaling by remodeling of stalled DNA replication forks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available