4.7 Article

Cognitive Decline After Stroke Relation to Inflammatory Biomarkers and Hippocampal Volume

Journal

STROKE
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 1433-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000536

Keywords

erythrocyte sedimentation rate; hippocampus; inflammation; poststroke cognitive performance

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Israel [3000000-5062]
  2. American Federation for Aging Research [RAG11482]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose-Inflammation may contribute to cognitive impairment after stroke. Inflammatory markers are associated with hippocampal atrophy. We tested whether markers of inflammation, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and serum levels of C-reactive protein are associated with reduced hippocampal volume and poor cognitive performance among stroke survivors. Methods-We analyzed 368 consecutive cases from our prospective study of first-ever mild-moderate stroke patients. MRI, cognitive tests, and inflammatory markers were determined. Patients were reevaluated 6 and 12 months after the event. Results-ESR remained unchanged in follow-up examinations, suggesting a chronic inflammation background in some patients. Higher levels of C-reactive protein and ESR were associated with worse performance in cognitive tests, particularly memory scores. This association was maintained for ESR (but not C-reactive protein) after adjustment for confounders (P=0.002). Patients with smaller hippocampi had inferior cognitive results. Moreover, in a multivariate regression model, higher ESR values (but not C-reactive protein) were related to reduced hippocampal volume (P=0.049). Conclusions-This report shows a strong relationship between ESR and hippocampal volume, as well as with cognitive performance among poststroke patients. This could plausibly relate to incipient cognitive decline via hippocampal pathways. (Stroke. 2013;44:1433-1435.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available