4.7 Article

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation May Improve Stroke-Related Dysphagia A Pilot Study

Journal

STROKE
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 1035-1040

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.602128

Keywords

dysphagia; noninvasive brain stimulation; stroke recovery; swallowing recovery; transcranial direct current stimulation

Funding

  1. NIH (NINDS) [5UO1-NS044876-03, 1R01-NS 057127-01A1, 1R01-NS 045754-01A2, 5R01-HL46690-14]
  2. Charles and Irene Goldman Neurology Research Fund
  3. NIH (NIDCD) [1RO1 DC008796, 3R01DC008796-02S1, R01 DC009823-01, 1R01-NS 057127]
  4. NIH [RO1 DC008796, RO1 DC009823]
  5. CIMIT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose-Treatment options for stroke-related dysphagia are currently limited. In this study, we investigated whether noninvasive brain stimulation in combination with swallowing maneuvers facilitates swallowing recovery in dysphagic stroke patients during early stroke convalescence. Methods-Fourteen patients with subacute unilateral hemispheric infarction were randomized to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) versus sham stimulation to the sensorimotor cortical representation of swallowing in the unaffected hemisphere over the course of 5 consecutive days with concurrent standardized swallowing maneuvers. Severity of dysphagia was measured using a validated swallowing scale, Dysphagia Outcome and Severity scale, before the first and after the last session of tDCS or sham. The effect of tDCS was analyzed in a multivariate linear regression model using changes in Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale as the outcome variable after adjusting for the effects of other potential confounding variables such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Dysphagia Outcome and Severity scale scores at baseline, acute ischemic lesion volumes, patient age, and time from stroke onset to stimulation. Results-Patients who received anodal tDCS gained 2.60 points of improvement in Dysphagia Outcome and Severity scale scores compared to patients in the sham stimulation group who showed an improvement of 1.25 points (P=0.019) after controlling for the effects of other aforementioned variables. Six out 7 (86%) patients in tDCS stimulation group gained at least 2 points of improvement compared with 3 out 7 (43%) patients in the sham group (P=0.107). Conclusions-Because brain stem swallowing centers have bilateral cortical innervations, measures that enhance cortical input and sensorimotor control of brain stem swallowing may be beneficial for dysphagia recovery. (Stroke. 2011;42:1035-1040.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available