4.7 Article

Faster Recovery of Cerebral Perfusion in SOD1-Overexpressed Rats After Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

Journal

STROKE
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 2512-2518

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.548453

Keywords

antioxidants; cardiac arrest; cerebral blood flow; diffusion-weighted imaging; free radical scavengers; gene regulation; MRI; neuroprotection; outcomes; transgenic rats

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke, National Institutes of Health [R01NS036124, P50NS014543, R01NS025372, R01NS036147, R01NS038653]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose-Protracted hypoperfusion is one of the hallmarks of secondary cerebral derangement after cardiac arrest and resuscitation (CAR), and reactive oxygen species have been implicated in reperfusion abnormalities. Methods-Using transgenic (Tg) rats overexpressing copper zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1), we investigated the role of this intrinsic antioxidant in the restoration of cerebral blood flow (CBF) after CAR. Nine Tg and 11 wild-type (WT) rats were subjected to a nominal 15-minute cardiac arrest, and CBF was measured using the noninvasive arterial spin labeling MRI method before and during cardiac arrest, and 0 to 2 hours and 1 to 5 days after resuscitation. Results-The SOD1-Tg rats showed rapid normalization of CBF 1 day after the insult, whereas CBF in WT animals remained abnormal for at least 5 days, showing a progressive increase in CBF from hypo-to hyperperfusion on postresuscitation days 1 to 5. The long-term outcome, as measured by survival time, change in body weight, and mapping of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for ion/water homeostasis, was significantly better in the SOD1-Tg rats. Conclusion-Our results support the notion that reactive oxygen species are at least partially responsible for microvascular reperfusion disorders. (Stroke. 2009; 40: 2512-2518.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available