4.7 Article

Gender Differences in Acute Ischemic Stroke Etiology, Stroke Patterns and Response to Thrombolysis

Journal

STROKE
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 2428-2432

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.548750

Keywords

gender; female; stroke; thrombolysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose-Differences between women and men in relation to stroke are increasingly being recognized. Methods-From July 2004 until June 2007, 237 acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients were treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) within 3 hours after onset of symptoms in our stroke unit. Baseline characteristics, etiology, CT/MRI stroke patterns, clinical outcome, and complications of women were compared to those of men. Results-Of 237 AIS patients (mean age 70.7 years), 111 (46.8%) were women and 126 (53.2%) were men. Women were older (P=0.001), but history of hyperlipidemia (P=0.03), smoking (P=0.03), and coronary heart disease (P<0.001) was less frequent than in men. Internal carotid artery disease occurred more often in men (P=0.02), whereas atrial fibrillation was observed more often in women (P=0.002). In men borderzone/small embolic and lacunar stroke was found more frequently (39.7 versus 27.2%), whereas women showed a higher percentage of large territorial stroke (72.8 versus 60.3%, P=0.09). Baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores (12.5 versus 11.3), NIHSS score at discharge (11.0 versus 9.5), 3-month-outcome modified Rankin Scale score, thrombolysis- related (17.1% versus 13.5%) or independent complications (32.4% versus 30.2%), and mortality after 3 months (13.5% versus 9.5%) were similar. Conclusion-Differences of stroke lesion patterns in genders are paralleled by differences in etiology and risk factor profiles (women, cardioembolism; men, large and small vessel disease). Baseline characteristics, rates of rtPA-related and independent complications, as well as clinical outcomes were not different between women and men with AIS. (Stroke. 2009; 40: 2428-2432.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available