Journal
STROKE
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 154-160Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.495705
Keywords
electrical stimulation; exercise therapy; gait; randomized clinical trial; rehabilitation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background and Purpose-This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer with or without functional electrical stimulation for people with subacute stroke. Methods-This was a nonblinded randomized controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up. Fifty-four subjects were recruited within 6 weeks after stroke onset and were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 gait intervention groups: conventional overground gait training treatment (CT, n = 21), electromechanical gait trainer ( GT, n = 17) and, electromechanical gait trainer with functional electrical stimulation (GT-FES, n = 16). All subjects were to undergo an assigned intervention program comprising a 20-minute session every weekday for 4 weeks. The outcome measures were Functional Independence Measure, Barthel Index, Motricity Index leg subscale, Elderly Mobility Scale ( EMS), Berg Balance Scale, Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC), and 5-meter walking speed test. Assessments were made at baseline, at the end of the 4-week intervention program, and 6 months after the program ended. Results-By intention-to-treat and multivariate analysis, statistically significant differences showed up in EMS (Wilks' lambda = 0.743, P = 0.005), FAC ( Wilks' lambda = 0.744, P = 0.005) and gait speed ( Wilks' lambda = 0.658, P < 0.0001). Post hoc analysis (univariate 2-way ANCOVA) revealed that the GT and GT-FES groups showed significantly better improvement in comparison with the CT group at the end of the 4 weeks of training and in the 6-month follow-up. Conclusions-For the early stage after stroke, this study indicated a higher effectiveness in poststroke gait training that used an electromechanical gait trainer compared with conventional overground gait training. The training effect was sustained through to the 6-month follow-up after the intervention.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available