4.7 Article

Simulating the transport and chemical evolution of biomass burning pollutants originating from Southeast Asia during 7-SEAS/2010 Dongsha experiment

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 294-305

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.055

Keywords

Biomass burning; Transport; Chemical evolution; Simulation; 2010 Dongsha experiment

Funding

  1. Taiwan National Science Council [NSC 100-2111-M-008-017-, NSC 101-2111-M-008-005-, NSC 102-2111-M-008-010-]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to simulate the transport of biomass burning (BB) aerosol originating from Southeast Asia (SEA) during the Dongsha Experiment conducted from March 2010 to April 2010. Transport pathways were reanalyzed and steering flow in the mid-latitude areas and anticyclones in low-latitude areas were found to control the transport of BB plume after it was injected to a high atmosphere. For the 12 simulated and observed events at Mt. Lulin (2862 m MSL; 23 degrees 28'07 '' N, 120 degrees 52'25 '' E), the 72 h backward trajectories were all tracked back to southern China and northern Indochina, which were the locations of the largest BB fire activities in SEA. Chemical evolutions of BB pollutants along the moving trajectories showed that organic matter was always the dominant component in PM2.3, consistent with the observations at both near-source regions and Mt Lulin. For nitrogen species, nearly all NOx molecules oxidized into HNO3, NO3-, PAN, and PANX in fires or near fires. The synchronic consumption of NOx, SO2, and NH3 explained the production of the major components of inorganic salts. In the moving BB plume, sulfate concentration increased with decreased nitrate concentration. Ratios of ammonium to PM2.3 and elemental carbon to PM2.3 remained nearly constant because additional sources were lacking. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available