4.3 Article

Feasibility of transrectal ultrasonography for assessment of cervical cancer

Journal

STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
Volume 189, Issue 2, Pages 123-128

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-012-0258-1

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Radiotherapy; Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Transrectal ultrasonography

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund FWF [L 562] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [L 562] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To retrospectively compare the maximum target width and target thickness in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in the course of primary radiochemotherapy. T2-weighted MRI and TRUS were performed on patients with locally advanced cervical cancer at the same timepoint-either at the time of diagnosis, or at the time of brachytherapy before or after insertion of the applicator. Patients treated from 2009 to 2011 were selected for this study based on the availability of MRI and TRUS at the defined time points. The target was defined as the complete macroscopic tumor mass and the remaining cervix and was measured on transversal planes. Descriptive statistics and a linear regression analysis were performed for the groups. Images from 17 patients were available for analysis. Mean maximum target width was 4.2 +/- 0.83 cm and 4.2 +/- 0.79 cm for MRI and TRUS, respectively. Mean maximum target thickness was 3.3 +/- 1.03 cm and 3.1 +/- 1.15 cm for MRI and TRUS, respectively. Linear regression analysis for target width and thickness between TRUS and MRI demonstrated a correlation with R-2 = 0.842 and R-2 = 0.943, respectively. The feasibility of TRUS for the assessment of local target extension could be demonstrated. Comparison of the target width and thickness showed a high correlation between TRUS and MRI, indicating the potential of TRUS for target definition in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available