4.3 Article

Dose Escalation in Prostate Radiotherapy up to 82 Gy Using Simultaneous Integrated Boost Direct Comparison of Acute and Late Toxicity with 3D-CRT 74 Gy and IMRT 78 Gy

Journal

STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
Volume 186, Issue 4, Pages 197-202

Publisher

URBAN & VOGEL
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-010-2065-x

Keywords

Prostate cancer; Conformal radiotherapy; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT); Dose escalation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To compare acute and Late toxicity after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to the prostate to 74 Gy (3D-CRT) with intensity-modulated radioterapy to 78 Gy (IMRT 78) and IMRT using simultaneous integrated boost to 82 Gy (IMRT/SIB 82). Patients and Methods: 94 patients treated with 3D-CRT to the prostate and base of seminal vesicles to 74 Gy represented the first group. The second group consisted of 138 patients subjected to IMRT covering the prostate and base of seminal vesicles to 78 Gy. The last group was treated with IMRT using SIB. The prescribed doses were 82 Gy and 73.8 Gy in 42 fractions to the prostate and seminal vesicles. Late toxicity was prospectively scored according to the RTOG/FC-LENT scale. Results: Acute gastrointestinal toxicity >= grade 2 occurred in 35.1% of patients treated with 30-CRT, in 16% subjected to IMRT 78, and in 7.7% receiving IMRT/SIB 82. Acute genitourinary toxicity >= grade 2 was observed in 26.6% (3D-CRT), 33% (IMRT 78), and 30.7% (IMRT/SIB 82). At 3 years, the estimated cumulative incidence of grade 3 late gastrointestinal toxicity was 14% for 3D-CRT, 5% for IMRT 78, and 2% for IMRT/SIB 82. The difference became significant (log rank p = 0.02). The estimated cumulative incidence of grade 3 late genitourinary toxicity was 9% (3D-CRT), 7% (IMRT 78), and 6% (IMRT/SIB 82) without statistical differences (log rank p = 0.32) Conclusion: SIB enables dose escalation up to 82 Gy with a lower rate of gastrointestinal toxicity grade 3 in comparison with 3D-CRT up to 74 Gy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available