4.7 Article

Assessing spatial pattern of urban thermal environment in Shanghai, China

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-012-0638-1

Keywords

Urban heat island; Human activities; Principal components analysis; Shanghai

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Y5110009]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [41101568]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)'s Land Cover and Land Use Program [NNX09AI32G]
  4. Zhi-Jiang Young Scholars Program through Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project [11ZJQN042YB]
  5. Qian-Jiang Talent Program
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012XZZX012]
  7. NASA [NNX09AI32G, 114451] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aggravating urban thermal environment has considerable adverse effects on urban physical environment, energy consumption, and public health. Due to the complexity of factors contributing to the urban thermal environment, traditional statistical methods are insufficient for acquiring data and analyzing the impacts of human activities on the thermal environment, especially for identifying dominant factors. Based on thermal remote sensing imageries and Geographic Information System analysis, we assessed spatial pattern of urban thermal environment in Shanghai in 2008, and analyzed the factors contributing to the generation of urban heat island (UHI) using principal component analysis (PCA). We found that Shanghai had obvious UHI with uneven spatial pattern in 2008. Further, we identified three most important components leading to the variances of Shanghai's UHI: the gradient from man-made to natural land cover, landscape configuration, and anthropogenic heat release. A linear model has thus been successfully constructed, implying that PCA is helpful in identifying major contributors to UHI. The findings are of significance for policy implication to urban thermal environment mitigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available