4.7 Article

Convergence of deterministic and stochastic approaches in optimal remediation design of a contaminated aquifer

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-008-0216-8

Keywords

Stochastic optimization; Multiple realization approach; Remediation design; Genetic algorithm

Funding

  1. Advanced Environmental Biotechnology Research Center (AEBRC)
  2. Sustainable Water Resources Research Center of 21st Century Frontier Research Program [3-4-3]
  3. Korea Energy Management Corporation (KEMCO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The comparison between two series of optimal remediation designs using deterministic and stochastic approaches showed a number of converging features. Limited sampling measurements in a supposed contaminated aquifer formed the hydraulic conductivity field and the initial concentration distribution used in the optimization process. The deterministic and stochastic approaches employed a single simulation-optimization method and a multiple realization approach, respectively. For both approaches, the optimization model made use of a genetic algorithm. In the deterministic approach, the total cost, extraction rate, and the number of wells used increase when the design must satisfy the intensified concentration constraint. Growing the stack size in the stochastic approach also brings about same effects. In particular, the change in the selection frequency of the used extraction wells, with increasing stack size, for the stochastic approach can indicate the locations of required additional wells in the deterministic approach due to the intensified constraints. These converging features between the two approaches reveal that a deterministic optimization approach with controlled constraints is achievable enough to design reliable remediation strategies, and the results of a stochastic optimization approach are readily available to real contaminated sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available