4.2 Article

A simple method for the small scale synthesis and solid-phase extraction purification of steroid sulfates

Journal

STEROIDS
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 74-80

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2014.09.006

Keywords

Sulfate ester; Steroid sulfate; Sulfation; Solid-phase extraction; Anti-doping

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP120200444]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP120200444] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Steroid sulfates are a major class of steroid metabolite that are of growing importance in fields such as anti-doping analysis, the detection of residues in agricultural produce or medicine. Despite this, many steroid sulfate reference materials may have limited or no availability hampering the development of analytical methods. We report simple protocols for the rapid synthesis and purification of steroid sulfates that are suitable for adoption by analytical laboratories. Central to this approach is the use of solid-phase extraction (SPE) for purification, a technique routinely used for sample preparation in analytical laboratories around the world. The sulfate conjugates of sixteen steroid compounds encompassing a wide range of steroid substitution patterns and configurations are prepared, including the previously unreported sulfate conjugates of the designer steroids furazadrol (17 beta-hydroxyandrostan[2,3-d]isoxazole), isofurazadrol (17 beta-hydroxyandrostan[3,2-c]isoxazole) and trenazone (17 beta-hydroxyestra-4,9-dien-3-one). Structural characterization data, together with NMR and mass spectra are reported for all steroid sulfates, often for the first time. The scope of this approach for small scale synthesis is highlighted by the sulfation of 1 mu g of testosterone (17 beta-hydroxyandrost-4-en-3-one) as monitored by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS). (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available