4.2 Article

Mass spectrometric identification and characterization of new fluoxymesterone metabolites in human urine by liquid chromatography time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

STEROIDS
Volume 77, Issue 8-9, Pages 871-877

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2012.04.003

Keywords

Fluoxymesterone; Metabolism; Liquid chromatography time-of-flight; tandem mass spectrometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study fiuoxymesterone urinary profiles were investigated by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (LC-QTOFMS) with accurate mass measurement. Twelve metabolites including the parent drug were detected in two fluoxymesterone positive control urine samples. Three parameters were employed for evaluation of the accuracy of the chemical formulae in positive full scan experiment, which contained error between actual and calculated mass weights of prontonated and isotopic molecules together with abundance match between prontonated and isotopic molecules. The 13 analytes were determined with mass accuracy less than 1.1 ppm and isotopic abundance match more than 94 marks. Based on the ionization, CID fragmentation, the accurate mass of the product ion and comparison of the accurate mass weight and retention time with reference standard, fluoxymesterone and its 12 metabolites containing three unreported ones were detected. The chemical structures of three unreported metabolites were identified as: 9-fluro-17 beta-01-17-methyl-11-en-5 alpha-androstan-3-one (F13), 9-fluro-17 beta-o1-17-methyl-11-en-5 beta-androstan-3-one (F8) and 9-fluro-17 beta-o1-17-methyl-5-androstan-3,6,11-trione, and meanwhile a dihydroxylated metabolite (F12), 6,16-dihydroxylated fluoxymesterone, was also detected in human urine, which was previously reported to be available only in equine urine. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available