4.2 Review

ER beta in breast cancer - Onlooker, passive player, or active protector?

Journal

STEROIDS
Volume 73, Issue 11, Pages 1039-1051

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2008.04.006

Keywords

estrogen receptor-beta; estrogen receptor-alpha; breast cancer; tamoxifen

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA044579] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK057082] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [P30-CA44579] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK579082, R01 DK057082-16] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of estrogen exposure in breast cancer risk is well-documented, and both estrogen synthesis and actions through the estrogen receptor (ER) have been targeted by therapies to control hormone-dependent breast cancer. The discovery of a second ER form and its therapeutic implications sparked great interest. Both the original ER alpha And. the more recently identified ER beta subtypes bind and respond similarly to many physiological and pharmacological ligands. However, differences in phytoestrogen binding have been noted, and subtype-specific ligands have been developed. Cell-based assays show that ER beta and its variants are generally less active on gene transcription than ER alpha, and may influence ER alpha activity; however, both gene- and cell-specific responses occur, and nongenomic activities are less well explored. Specific ligands, and methods to disrupt or eliminate receptor subtype expression in animal and cell models, demonstrate that the ERs have both overlapping and distinct biological functions. Overall, in cell-based studies, ER alpha appears to play a predominant role in cell proliferation, and ER beta is suggested to be antiproliferative. The potential for distinct populations of breast tumors to be identified based on ER subtype expression, and to exhibit distinct clinical behaviors, is of greatest interest. Several studies suggest that the majority of ER-positive tumors contain both subtypes, but that some tumors contain only ER beta and may have distinct clinical behaviors and responses. Expression of ER beta together with ER alpha favors positive responses to endocrine therapy in most studies, and additional studies to determine if the addition of ER beta to ER alpha as a tumor marker is of clinical benefit are warranted. In contrast, the positive association between ER beta and HER2 expression in high-grade ER alpha-negative breast cancer does not favor positive responses to endocrine therapy. Expression of ER beta in specific clinical subpopulations, and the potential for therapies targeting ER beta specifically, is discussed. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available